Complementarities Between Employee Involvement and Financial Participation: Do Institutional Context, Differing Measures, and Empirical Methods Matter?
Type of Work
Article
Date
2017
Journal Title
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Journal ISSN
0019-7939
Journal Volume
7
Journal Issue
2
First Page
395
Last Page
418
DOI
10.1177/0019793916657538
Abstract
The authors investigate whether productivity is greater if firms use employee involvement (EI) in decision making and financial participation (FP) as complementary practices. Based on representative panel data from Finnish manufacturing firms, the study uses diverse specifications to examine different theoretical explanations of the productivity effects of complementarities. The authors find virtually no evidence to support the theory of complementarities when EI and FP are simply measured by their incidence. They do find some evidence for complementarities using cross-sectional data (controlling for several covariates that related work has found to be important for firm performance) and also when analyses use measures of the intensity of FP. In accounting for differences in empirical findings across varying settings, the findings suggest that outcomes depend on the institutional context and are sensitive to variation in measurement and analytical methods.
JEL Classification: D22, D24, J24, J54, L25, L60, M54
Citation Information
Jones, Derek C.; Kalmi, Panu; Kato, Takao; and Mäkinen, Mikko, "Complementarities Between Employee Involvement and Financial Participation: Do Institutional Context, Differing Measures, and Empirical Methods Matter?" (2017). Hamilton Digital Commons.
https://digitalcommons.hamilton.edu/articles/204
Hamilton Areas of Study
Economics